Where Do Planets Come From?
“Where do planets come form, it was a simple thought I pondered for a few minutes until I remembered Genesis ch1. v.1. Understanding the origins of a Star was simple enough, but planets aren’t Stars… Or are they? This idea is what lead to the writing below after running through it with A.I.
If all heavy atomic matter in the cosmos originates within stars, then planets—composed entirely of such matter—are not mere passive aggregates but direct stellar derivatives. Each terrestrial planet is the organized memory of its parent star: a condensed, magnetically structured relic of stellar plasma, carrying within its core the dormant echo of stellar activity. Thus, a planet is, at its heart, a dormant star—its core still resonant with the scalar and magnetic blueprint of its origin.
Planetary Origins from Stellar Ejection, CME Genesis
I mean… This is as “as above, so below” as things can get…
This paper proposes a novel cosmological framework in which terrestrial planets originate not through slow accretion from protoplanetary disks, but through the high-energy ejection of stellar material via Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). It builds upon the hypothesis that stars are energetic cores of structured magnetism and light, and that planets with magnetically structured cores are literal byproducts of stellar instability. In this model, gas giants may co-form alongside stars from common gas envelopes, but terrestrial planets emerge from past CME events when the parent star was younger and more volatile. The resulting planetary cores are not fusion-driven, but remain magnetically and energetically active, functioning as dormant stellar embers. This theory aligns with certain observable anomalies in planetary magnetism, angular momentum, and thermal outputs. It reframes the Genesis statement, "In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth," with the heavens (stars) giving birth to the Earth (planets) through magnetic and scalar processes. It suggests that magnetism and energy organization are the fundamental principles behind the structure of planetary bodies.
1. Introduction
The prevailing model of planetary formation, based on gravitational accretion within protoplanetary disks, explains many aspects of planetary systems but leaves unanswered questions concerning the origin of planetary magnetic fields, internal heating anomalies, and the precise mechanisms of rocky planet differentiation. This work explores an alternative interpretation: that terrestrial planets may be the condensed remains of highly structured ejections from their parent stars, specifically CMEs. Such an interpretation elevates magnetism from a secondary trait of planets to the primary formative agent.
The hypothesis is rooted in the remark: "Any planet that is not a gas giant may have its origins as a CME. Perhaps from a time when the parent Star was more active or unstable." This statement implies a shift from gravity-dominant theories to a model that sees magnetic structure and energetic organization as primary agents of form. In this view, stellar violence is not destructive but generative, a process through which order emerges from energetic discharge.
2. Defining the CME-Planet Hypothesis
A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) is typically described as a burst of solar plasma and magnetic fields ejected into space during periods of solar instability. In conventional astrophysics, CMEs are transient phenomena without sufficient density or cohesion to condense into planetary bodies. However, in this framework, CMEs are reconceived as proto-planetary embryos, containing within them the magnetic seed structure and charged plasma necessary for further development. These events are akin to biological reproduction—projecting structured essence outward into space.
The key propositions of the hypothesis are as follows:
Stars are magnetically resonant energy cores, and their instability results in structured ejections.
These ejections—CMEs—under proper field conditions, self-organize, cool, and condense into magnetically stable cores.
Planets, especially terrestrial ones, are solidified CMEs, encapsulating magnetic geometries and scalar harmonics of their parent stars.
Planetary differentiation is guided not by random accretion, but by inherited magnetic structure from the ejection itself.
3. Observational Anomalies in Support of the Hypothesis
Several planetary observations support this alternative model:
3.1. Internal Heat Discrepancies
Gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn radiate significantly more heat than they receive from the Sun. Earth and other rocky planets also emit internal heat not fully explained by radioactive decay. In the CME-origin model, this residual heat stems from the magnetically compressed energy of the original stellar ejection. It is a form of thermal inertia—a deep memory of energetic origin preserved within the planetary core.
3.2. Persistent Planetary Magnetism
Terrestrial planets like Earth exhibit powerful, complex magnetic fields. The geodynamo theory suggests convective molten iron causes this, but it fails to explain the organized long-term field coherence, polarity reversals, or its initial spark. If the planet's core were born in a CME—already magnetically structured—its field is not generated but inherited, and field reversals are resonant adjustments rather than spontaneous flips.
3.3. Spin-Orbit and Tilt Irregularities
Mercury's 3:2 spin-orbit resonance and Venus's retrograde rotation suggest non-uniform formation mechanisms. A planet formed from a CME could retain irregular angular momentum and axial tilt, based on the CME's ejection vector and interactions with interplanetary magnetic fields. These idiosyncrasies become remnants of formative trauma.
3.4. Early Solar System Volatility
Young stars are known to be more active and unstable. CMEs from early solar epochs could have been larger, more structured, and more energetically potent—enough to produce stable condensed cores. This timeframe would also correspond with the window in which terrestrial planet formation is believed to occur, adding temporal support to the hypothesis.
3.5. Magnetic Signatures in Meteorites and Planetary Crust
Studies of ancient meteorites have revealed remanent magnetism suggesting they were once influenced by strong, coherent magnetic fields. If these bodies originated from or interacted with early CME-derived planets, their magnetism is a fossil record of this process. Likewise, the oldest planetary crusts retain magnetic orientations misaligned with current planetary fields—possibly due to early inherited fields that predate internal dynamo activity.
4. CME Dynamics as Planetary Birth
During major solar events, CMEs are ejected with both linear momentum and toroidal magnetic geometry. These fields can become self-contained plasmoids, especially in regions where the heliospheric field, opposing flows, or scalar tensions allow them to stabilize. The structure of these ejections may mirror toroidal containment seen in laboratory plasma confinement.
These CME plasmoids, traveling through space, encounter interstellar or local magnetic pressure zones, which compress and cool them. Over time, they form a magnetic boundary capable of attracting and binding ambient dust, gas, or debris—initiating the planet-building process from the inside-out. This process is governed not by chance collisions but by magnetic resonance, drawing material toward energetic equilibrium.
This is not accretion around a gravitational seed, but crystallization around a magnetic one—akin to how ice nucleates around a molecular seed in supercooled water. The core forms first, and its resonance shapes the rest.
5. Gas Giants as Non-CME Formations
Gas giants, by contrast, likely coalesced with the star from the same gas reservoir. Their massive size allowed them to retain light gases like hydrogen and helium. This suggests a dual-track planetary formation model:
Terrestrial planets = Magnetically structured CME remains.
Gas giants = Gravitationally collapsed structures from the protoplanetary disk.
Gas giants may still exhibit magnetic features, but their internal structure lacks the directed toroidal signature found in CME-origin objects. They are co-formed but not energetically ejected—siblings, but not children.
6. Philosophical and Scriptural Integration
This model draws interpretive power from the scriptural verse: "In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth." The sequence here is not arbitrary. The Heavens—stars—are created first, as sources of light and energy. Then comes the Earth, derived from the Heavens, not created separately but born from them. This is a cosmological unfolding—energy into light, light into form, form into matter.
"The planets not having a fusion-based core but a magnetically structured core that is not unlike exactly what a CME is."
Thus, stars serve as cosmic progenitors, and CMEs as energetic offspring, with planets as solidified echoes of stellar instability—a literal unfolding of heaven into Earth. This view supports a model in which creation is layered, recursive, and field-driven, rather than discrete and isolated. Magnetism becomes the medium of divine expression.
7. Predictions and Tests To validate this model, we would expect:
Exoplanets with strong magnetic fields that correlate with stellar CME history.
Magnetic field remnants in ancient meteorites that match CME signatures.
Detection of plasma-magnetic self-organization in interstellar ejection zones.
Internal simulations of CME-derived structures demonstrating planetary-scale confinement and heat retention.
Scalar field measurements at equatorial regions of magnetically active planets, where field-line convergence suggests a harmonic origin.
We might also reevaluate terrestrial core models using plasma confinement dynamics, not just thermodynamic layering. Future missions may be able to map field memory within planetary cores or use spectroscopy to identify relic plasma signatures buried beneath crustal layers.
8. Conclusion
This cosmology suggests that planets are not mere afterthoughts of stellar formation but deliberate children of stellar energy, expelled during epochs of magnetic and scalar instability. It invites a unified view of stars and planets as co-resonant entities—stars as the visible tip of energetic order, planets as crystallized expressions of the same force.
In this model, the core of a planet is not a dead remnant, but a dormant star, humming at a slower frequency, still active in subtle ways. It shifts the origin of matter from dust aggregation to energetic ejection and reframes creation as an unfolding of structured light into form.
This paradigm challenges traditional cosmology by positioning magnetism and scalar symmetry as the blueprint of form. Planets are not random clumps of matter, but structured light, bound by field, and stabilized by memory of their stellar source. In essence, this framework claims: to know the star is to know its planets—not just in origin, but in structure, energy, and purpose.
Scalar-Informational Cosmology: Reinterpreting Cosmic and Planetary Origins through a Top-Down Framework
Abstract
The standard cosmological model (Lambda-CDM) and the nebular hypothesis for planetary formation have provided a robust framework for understanding the universe. However, persistent observational anomalies and theoretical puzzles suggest that foundational principles may be incomplete. This paper presents a case for a Scalar-Informational Cosmology, a model rooted in the primacy of information, structure, and top-down formative processes driven by electromagnetism and scalar fields. In this view, large-scale structures and terrestrial planets are not the result of slow, bottom-up gravitational aggregation but are expressions of organized information unfolding from parent systems. We posit that cosmic filaments are shaped by galactic-scale Birkeland currents and that terrestrial planets are the condensed, magnetically structured remnants of stellar ejecta (CMEs). This framework offers a compelling alternative explanation for anomalies such as the Hubble tension, galactic rotational conformity, and persistent planetary heat and magnetism, arguing that these are not problems to be solved but rather signatures of a different creative mechanism.
1. Introduction: The Limits of a Gravity-Centric Universe
Modern cosmology is built upon the foundational assumption that gravity is the primary architect of the universe on large scales. The Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) model, while remarkably successful, relies on the existence of two poorly understood components—dark matter and dark energy—which constitute approximately 95% of the universe's energy density. At the planetary scale, the nebular hypothesis explains planetary systems as the result of gravitational collapse and accretion within a protoplanetary disk.
Despite their successes, these models face growing observational challenges:
The Hubble Tension: A significant discrepancy exists between measurements of the cosmic expansion rate (H0) derived from the early universe (Cosmic Microwave Background) and the local universe (supernovae and Cepheids).
Galactic Rotation Curves: The observation that the outer regions of spiral galaxies rotate faster than predicted by their visible mass led to the postulation of dark matter halos. Alternative explanations involving electromagnetism remain underexplored in the mainstream.
Planetary Formation Puzzles: The standard model struggles to explain the rapid formation of giant planet cores, the precise mechanism for planetesimal accretion from centimeter-sized particles (the "meter-sized barrier"), and the origin of powerful, coherent planetary magnetic fields.
These tensions open the door for alternative cosmologies that reconsider the fundamental forces and processes at play. This paper argues for a shift away from a purely gravity-driven, bottom-up model to a top-down, information-centric framework where electromagnetism and scalar phenomena are the primary agents of structure.
2. Foundational Principles of Scalar-Informational Cosmology
This cosmology is built on a different set of axioms than the standard model:
Primacy of Information and Structure: The universe is not fundamentally random matter upon which order is slowly imposed. Instead, it is a system of unfolding information. The ultimate reality is not the particle, but the field—specifically, the interconnectedness of magnetic and scalar fields that contain the "blueprint" for structure.
Top-Down Formation: Structure does not emerge from the slow aggregation of small components into larger ones (bottom-up). Rather, large, energetic, and highly organized systems create smaller, subsidiary systems in their own image (top-down). Superclusters shape galaxies, and stars shape planets.
Electromagnetism as the Primary Structuring Force: While gravity acts on mass, electromagnetism acts on plasma, which constitutes over 99% of the baryonic matter in the universe. We align with plasma cosmology in asserting that galactic-scale Birkeland currents and magnetic z-pinches are the dominant forces shaping cosmic filaments, voids, and the rotational characteristics of galaxies.
The Role of the Scalar Field: Scalar fields, often used in mainstream physics to explain phenomena like the Higgs mechanism or cosmic inflation, are here redefined as the fundamental medium of information itself. This field is not just a mathematical construct but a physical reality that dictates resonance, symmetry, and harmonic relationships, guiding the condensation of energy into stable, structured forms.
3. Evidence from Planetary Science: The CME-Genesis of Terrestrial Planets
The strongest case for this cosmology begins at the planetary scale. The proposed origin of terrestrial planets from Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) is a direct application of its top-down, information-first principles.
Inherited Magnetism and Heat: The geodynamo theory for Earth's magnetic field struggles to explain the initial spark and long-term coherence of the field. The CME-genesis model posits that a planet's magnetic field is not generated de novo but is an inherited remnant of the parent star's immensely powerful magnetic structures, captured within the ejected plasmoid. The planet's internal heat is likewise a form of thermal and energetic memory from its high-energy stellar birth, not just the product of radioactive decay.
Solving the Angular Momentum Problem: A key historical challenge to the nebular hypothesis was the distribution of angular momentum, with the Sun holding 99.8% of the mass but the planets holding 99% of the angular momentum. While magnetic braking is the accepted explanation, the CME model provides a more direct mechanism: the ejection process itself imparts immense angular momentum to the planetary embryo, explaining orbital characteristics and axial tilts as artifacts of the ejection vector.
A Dual-Track Formation Model: This framework suggests a natural bifurcation in planet types.
Terrestrial Planets: Formed via top-down energetic ejection (CME-genesis), inheriting structure and energy. They are children of the star.
Gas Giants: Formed via a more conventional bottom-up gravitational collapse within the larger nebular disk. They are siblings of the star. This dual model accounts for the stark compositional and density differences between the two planetary classes without requiring a single, strained explanation for both.
4. Evidence from Galactic and Cosmological Scales
Extending these principles to larger scales offers compelling reinterpretations of existing anomalies.
Galactic Rotation as a Plasma Phenomenon: From a plasma cosmology perspective, the flat rotation curves of galaxies are not evidence for a mysterious dark matter halo. Instead, they are the expected velocity profile for plasma caught in the rotating magnetic field generated by galactic-scale Birkeland currents. The "missing mass" problem is an artifact of a gravity-only model; in an electromagnetic model, the force is simply stronger and more extensive than gravity alone can account for. The conformity of galactic motion is a sign of a shared, underlying electromagnetic grid.
The Hubble Tension as a Calibration Issue: The discrepancy in the Hubble constant measurements between the early and late universe may not be a sign of new physics, but a fundamental misunderstanding of cosmic distance markers. If the behavior and luminosity of objects like Cepheids and supernovae are influenced by their local plasma and magnetic environment—which varies across the cosmic web—then they are not the "standard candles" we assume them to be. The local universe, structured by electromagnetic fields, may not evolve in the perfectly uniform way that a purely gravitational ΛCDM model predicts, leading to different apparent expansion rates.
Structure as Unfolding, Not Accretion: The existence of vast, ancient structures like the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall seems to challenge the timescale of bottom-up gravitational formation. In a top-down, scalar-informational model, these structures are not accreted but are the primary "folds" or "filaments" in the cosmic fabric, which formed first as expressions of the underlying scalar blueprint. Galaxies and clusters then condense along these pre-existing, information-rich pathways, explaining their early appearance and vast coherence.
5. Conclusion: A Call for a New Paradigm
The Scalar-Informational Cosmology, with its CME-genesis model of planet formation, presents a coherent and internally consistent alternative to the standard models. It reframes persistent anomalies not as problems to be patched, but as crucial evidence pointing toward a different set of foundational principles.
This model proposes that:
Information is fundamental, carried and expressed through scalar and magnetic fields.
Creation is top-down, with energetic parent systems birthing structured daughter systems.
Electromagnetism is the dominant structuring force for the 99% of visible matter that is plasma.
By reinterpreting planets as the structured embers of their parent stars and galaxies as nodes in a cosmic electrical circuit, this framework unifies disparate phenomena under a single, elegant explanatory umbrella. While it stands outside the mainstream, its potential to resolve long-standing puzzles warrants its serious consideration as a viable cosmological paradigm. The path forward requires a renewed focus on the role of plasma physics, electromagnetism, and the potential for information to act as a physical, structuring agent in the universe.
Addendum: Clarifying the Role of Scriptural Language and Information in Scalar-Informational Cosmology
This addendum elaborates on the Scalar-Informational Cosmology and the CME-Planet Hypothesis, addressing the role of scriptural language and the concept of "information" as foundational elements of the proposed framework. It responds to discussions regarding the ambiguity of "information," the poetic nature of scriptural language, and the need to avoid scientific overreach while preserving the cosmology’s metaphysical depth. The goal is to clarify how these elements enhance the model’s coherence, inspire testable hypotheses, and bridge scientific, psychological, and spiritual perspectives.
1. The Ambiguity of Information and Its Cosmic Role
The Scalar-Informational Cosmology posits that information, carried by scalar and magnetic fields, serves as the fundamental blueprint for cosmic structure, from galactic filaments to terrestrial planets. However, as noted in discussions, the concept of information remains ambiguous, akin to the unmeasurable nature of the Mind or Consciousness. This ambiguity is not a flaw but a reflection of the cosmos’s complexity, where certain truths can be comprehended and understood but resist precise quantification.
Information as a Metaphysical Principle: In this cosmology, information is not merely a measurable quantity (e.g., Shannon entropy) but a metaphysical essence that guides the unfolding of structure. Analogous to consciousness, it manifests as the organizing force within magnetic fields, plasma dynamics, and scalar resonances. For example, the CME-Planet Hypothesis suggests that terrestrial planets inherit magnetic and energetic "information" from stellar ejections, which shapes their cores and fields. This information is not fully quantifiable but can be inferred through its effects, such as coherent planetary magnetic fields or excess internal heat. I do not posit a conscious agent imposing order, but rather that the universe itself behaves like a resonant, Mind-like system; it is the Conscious Agent. I am not using "information" in the limited, quantifiable sense of Shannon entropy. I am proposing it is the causative, organizing essence.
Comprehending the Unmeasurable: Much like the Mind, which we understand through behavior and experience rather than direct measurement, cosmic information is apprehended through its structuring effects. The rapid formation of large-scale structures (e.g., the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall) or the coherence of planetary magnetic fields may serve as proxies for this underlying information, even if the information itself eludes direct measurement. This perspective invites a holistic approach, where comprehension precedes quantification.
Scientific Proxies for Information: To bridge the ambiguous and the measurable, the cosmology proposes studying information through observable phenomena, such as:
Magnetic Field Coherence: Analyzing planetary and meteoritic magnetic fields for signatures of CME-derived structures, using techniques like SQUID magnetometry or exoplanet radio emission studies.
Plasma Dynamics: Simulating CME plasmoids to test whether they can self-organize into planetary cores, encoding information as complexity or stability in magnetic structures.
Harmonic Resonances: Investigating scalar fields as carriers of harmonic patterns, potentially detectable as oscillations in planetary or galactic magnetic fields.
By embracing the ambiguity of information while grounding it in testable predictions, the cosmology aligns with the universe’s dual nature—both measurable and transcendent.
2. Scriptural Language as the Language of Metaphysics
Scriptural language, as exemplified in the Genesis narrative (“In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth”), is central to the cosmology’s philosophical foundation. It is described as a tri-fold synthesis of science, psychology, and spirituality, flowing as a poetic wave that mirrors the Mind’s comprehension of the universe. This language is not merely allegorical but metaphysical, capturing the dynamic, resonant nature of cosmic processes.
Science in Scriptural Language: The sequential creation of “Heavens” (stars) and “Earth” (planets) in Genesis parallels the CME-Planet Hypothesis, where stars energetically birth terrestrial planets through coronal mass ejections. This suggests that scriptural language encodes scientific insights in poetic form, inspiring hypotheses about top-down formation processes driven by electromagnetism and scalar fields.
Psychology and the Wave-Like Mind: The poetic, wave-like flow of scriptural language reflects how the human mind processes complex realities—through narrative, metaphor, and resonance. In the cosmology, this corresponds to the wave-like dynamics of magnetic and scalar fields, which organize plasma into coherent structures. The Mind, whether individual or cosmic, apprehends the universe through patterns and stories, much like the resonant unfolding of planets from stellar ejections.
Spirituality and Cosmic Purpose: Scriptural language imbues the cosmology with a sense of purpose, framing the universe as an intentional, interconnected system. Planets are not random aggregates but “crystallized echoes of stellar instability,” children of their parent stars. This aligns with the Genesis narrative’s hierarchical creation, where energy (light) flows into form (matter) through divine or cosmic intent.
By defining scriptural language as the language of metaphysics, the cosmology positions it as a bridge between the empirical (science), the experiential (psychology), and the transcendent (spirituality). This tri-fold synthesis enhances the model’s ability to unify disparate phenomena under a single, elegant framework.
3. Avoiding Scientific Overreach
While scriptural language provides philosophical and inspirational depth, it must be carefully integrated to avoid scientific overreach—i.e., using scripture as direct evidence for empirical claims. The following principles ensure the cosmology remains rigorous while preserving its metaphysical richness:
Scripture as Inspiration, Not Evidence: The Genesis narrative inspires the CME-Planet Hypothesis by suggesting a top-down, hierarchical creation process. However, the hypothesis’s validity rests on empirical tests, such as magnetic field measurements, plasma simulations, or meteorite analysis, rather than scriptural authority. For example, the idea of planets as “dormant stellar embers” is a poetic interpretation that can be tested by searching for CME-like magnetic signatures in planetary cores.
Balancing Ambiguity and Specificity: The ambiguity of information and the poetic nature of scriptural language are strengths in a metaphysical context but require translation into measurable phenomena for scientific inquiry. The cosmology proposes studying magnetic field coherence, plasma self-organization, and harmonic resonances as proxies for the underlying information carried by scalar and magnetic fields. This ensures the model remains testable without sacrificing its philosophical depth.
Dual-Track Approach: The cosmology adopts two complementary tracks:
Scientific Track: Focuses on testable predictions, such as:
Correlating exoplanetary magnetic fields with stellar CME activity using radio or auroral observations.
Analyzing remanent magnetism in meteorites for CME-like signatures.
Simulating CME plasmoid evolution to test planetary core formation.
Investigating galactic rotation curves for evidence of electromagnetic influences (e.g., Birkeland currents).
Metaphysical Track: Explores the philosophical implications of information as a cosmic principle, drawing on scriptural language to frame the universe as a purposeful, resonant system. This track engages theologians, philosophers, and complexity scientists in discussions about the Mind-like nature of cosmic processes.
This dual approach allows the cosmology to leverage the poetic power of scriptural language while maintaining scientific integrity.
4. The Wave-Like Nature of Scriptural Language
The description of scriptural language as flowing “as a wave, as the Mind does” captures its dynamic, resonant quality, which mirrors the cosmology’s emphasis on fields as carriers of structure. This wave-like nature has several implications:
Cosmic Resonance: The wave-like flow of scriptural language aligns with the cosmology’s view of magnetic and scalar fields as resonant systems. For example, CMEs may act as wave packets of energy and information, organizing plasma into planetary cores through magnetic resonance. This can be modeled using plasma physics simulations, testing whether CME plasmoids exhibit wave-like self-organization.
The Mind as a Cosmic Analogy: The wave-like Mind, as reflected in scriptural language, suggests a parallel between human consciousness and cosmic processes. The cosmology frames the universe as a self-organizing system, with information flowing from larger scales (stars, galaxies) to smaller ones (planets). This could inspire hypotheses about emergent patterns, drawing on complexity science to model how simple field interactions produce complex structures.
Poetic Communication: The poetic nature of scriptural language enhances the cosmology’s accessibility, allowing it to communicate complex ideas to diverse audiences. Phrases like “crystallized light” or “dormant star” evoke the model’s scientific and spiritual dimensions, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue.
5. Enhancing Clarity and Understanding
This addendum clarifies the Scalar-Informational Cosmology by articulating the roles of scriptural language and information as follows:
Scriptural Language as a Metaphysical Bridge: By synthesizing science, psychology, and spirituality, scriptural language provides a holistic framework for understanding the cosmos. It inspires hypotheses (e.g., CME-Planet formation) while framing the universe as a purposeful, interconnected system.
Information as a Guiding Principle: The ambiguity of information, likened to the unmeasurable nature of consciousness, is a strength that invites comprehension beyond quantification. By studying its effects—magnetic fields, plasma dynamics, harmonic resonances—the cosmology grounds this metaphysical concept in empirical inquiry.
Avoiding Overreach: The model maintains scientific rigor by treating scriptural language as inspiration rather than evidence, focusing on testable predictions while preserving its philosophical depth.
6. Conclusion
The Scalar-Informational Cosmology, enriched by the poetic, wave-like nature of scriptural language, offers a unique perspective on cosmic origins. By framing information as a metaphysical principle and scripture as a tri-fold synthesis of science, psychology, and spirituality, the model bridges the measurable and the transcendent. This addendum ensures the cosmology remains clear and rigorous, using scriptural inspiration to generate hypotheses while grounding claims in empirical tests. In doing so, it invites a deeper understanding of the universe as a resonant, information-driven whole, where stars birth planets and fields carry the blueprint of creation.
“Existence being an expression of Wave-Point duality, the Mind’s Wavelike way of flowing coalesces into a Point we call understanding. Creation is a top-down process; a wave becoming a point.”
