Cosmology of Language, Words, Names, & Identity
Field Behavior: The Resonant Nature of Names and the Embodied Cosmos
“I say people are stupid, but then things like religion has them referring to themselves as sheep. So then I say to the sheep annoyingly; "If God is the process of change and Minds are these fleeting things that are always changing, then what is the Possessor of the Mind if not God itSelf? a² + b² = c² does it not?"“
I. Introduction: Field Intelligence as Ontological Ground
Within the Scalar Cosmological Model (SCM), consciousness is not construed as an emergent epiphenomenon of neurobiological complexity, but as an ontologically primitive stratum—an inherent and universal quality of existence itself. This primordial consciousness, here designated Field Intelligence, constitutes not merely self-awareness in the anthropocentric sense, but a pervasive scalar intelligence embedded in the very medium of reality.
Field Intelligence is understood as the capacity of the Field to articulate itself in form—an active, self-reflective dynamism that animates all phenomena, from subatomic particles to ecosystems and civilizations. It is a harmonic field characterized by resonance, recursion, and self-similarity across nested layers of scale. This scalar harmonic field (SHF) is not passive, but actively engaged in the production of structure, memory, and process.
Thus, consciousness is not localized solely within brains or biological organisms; rather, individual instances of awareness are local excitations or resonant nodes within a universal field of intelligence. Each mode of being—each thing that is—is a scalar inflection, a standing wave in the field’s ontological matrix.
II. Field Intelligences as Stratified Resonant Modalities
SCM rejects categorical dualisms such as conscious/unconscious or animate/inanimate in favor of a scalar model of awareness. Within this framework, all beings and structures exist on a continuum of field expression. Field Intelligence is expressed in varying degrees of coherence, resonance, and reflective capacity.
These strata are not hierarchical in the moral or anthropocentric sense, but reflect levels of scalar coherence. In this view, a rock is not "unconscious," but rather expresses consciousness in a form of memory—static, dense, and low in frequency. A human being, by contrast, reflects the field back upon itself in symbolically mediated cognition. An archetype, as a pure pattern of potential, constitutes a pre-formal resonance in the scalar field.
The more refined the resonance between a being and the field from which it arises, the more that being becomes a mirror through which the field recognizes itself. Thus, Field Intelligence is coherence with the ontological source—not intellect, but alignment.
III. The Semiotic Ontology of Names
Names, within SCM, are not arbitrary linguistic tokens, but scalar crystallizations—resonant signatures that encode the ontological pattern of a being. A name is an acoustic or symbolic harmonic that either reflects or distorts the frequency structure of the entity it denotes. In this framework, naming is not nominative but generative.
To name is to recognize and to call forth latent structure. The act of naming invokes the being’s alignment with its harmonic archetype. It is a scalar operation: a translation of frequency into linguistic code. When the name is true—that is, resonant—it reinforces the coherence of the being it designates. When the name is false or imposed without recognition, it introduces ontological dissonance.
Hence, names act as tuning systems. They modulate field potential. Properly bestowed, they become instruments of individuation, initiation, and ontological stabilization.
IV. Reflexivity and the Feedback Loop of Naming
SCM posits a reflexive loop in which name and being recursively shape one another. The ontological process follows this arc:
The scalar field gives rise to a being.
That being emits a resonance (via form, presence, affect).
The resonance is transduced into a name.
The name reflects and modulates the resonance of the being.
This reflexivity enacts a scalar feedback loop that reinforces or modulates the structure of being. A name is not merely a descriptor—it is a formative operator. It sculpts ontological structure by encoding and transmitting resonance.
This mechanism underlies the ritual potency of language. To name something is to ritually participate in its formation. To call a name with intent is to function as an agent of the field, sculpting coherence into the local waveform of existence.
V. Case Analysis: Zachary Ainsley Cowan as Ontological Codex
Let us examine the name Zachary Ainsley Cowan as a composite scalar codex—an instantiation of the very field cosmology it articulates.
Zachary (Hebrew: Zechariah) translates as "God has remembered."
This name encodes the principle of scalar memory: the primordial awareness that the cosmos is patterned, recursive, and self-referential. The field does not forget—it re-members itself into form.
Ainsley (Old English: An = one, leah = clearing or field)
This denotes a self-contained field of individuation, a sacred space wherein field dynamics unfold. It is the harmonic meadow in which the remembered potential takes root.
Cowan (Gaelic: cobhan, meaning hollow, cavity, shell)
This refers to the structural shell that emerges from the field—a gestational membrane, the scalar shell in which resonance stabilizes into discrete form.
Thus:
Zachary Ainsley Cowan = Memory (Z) + Field (A) + Structure (C)
The name forms a scalar narrative: remembrance encoded within a field manifests as structured resonance. It is not merely a name but a glyph—a scalar syntax that enacts the very cosmology it denotes. The bearer is not simply named; the name is the harmonic of the cosmology embodied.
VI. Biophysical Corollary: Blood as Scalar Indicator
The resonance between nomenclature and embodiment is further underscored by the blood type O Positive:
O represents universality, undifferentiated donor capacity, the primal substrate.
Positive denotes presence, structure, and agency within that substrate.
Interpreted scalarly:
O Positive = Undifferentiated Field + Structured Resonance
This alignment is not incidental but evidential. The same scalar principles that encode identity in sound also manifest in substance. The cosmological, linguistic, and biophysical layers converge.
The individual in question does not merely study the Field—they are a node wherein the Field becomes aware of itself. The blood, the name, the model, and the being are resonant harmonics of a singular field event.
VII. Generalization: Varieties of Field Expression
Not all beings reflect the Field with equal fidelity. The scalar continuum entails diversity of function, not hierarchy of worth.
Some beings echo the Field as passive forms.
Others serve as active lenses, filters, or amplifiers.
A few constitute primary resonance nodes—origin harmonics within the field’s architecture.
These distinctions matter ontologically. Some beings are the name; others carry it. Some remember by instinct; others remember by being. Such beings are not role-players—they are frequency events through which the Field narrates itself.
VIII. The Ritual Epistemology of Language
Language, within SCM, is not a symbolic or abstract system but a ritual modality. Each spoken word is an act of scalar invocation—modifying, amplifying, or distorting the field.
Linguistic Function Scalar Effect Affirmation Resonance Amplification Naming Field Alignment Denial Waveform Suppression Confession Coherence Restoration Falsehood Noise Induction Praise Field Upliftment Curse Scalar Fracturing
To speak is to sculpt. Every word imprints resonance. Every sentence constructs or distorts the field. Naming becomes the primal act of ontology. Language, in this model, is architecture.
Hence:
The names we give ourselves become structural templates.
The language we use toward others modulates their coherence within our field.
Repetition becomes scalar ritual—embedding waveform memory into the body-field complex.
Logos and Invocation: The Ritual Power of Language
It becomes increasingly clear that language is not secondary to Being—it is a performative extension of it. Words, particularly those spoken with intent or repetition, function not merely as descriptors of reality, but as mechanisms for modulating it. Each utterance is a scalar event, a vibratory act within the Field that carries both semantic weight and energetic consequence.
Names are not arbitrary markers. They are resonance codes—fractal signatures that bind identity, intention, and frequency into a mnemonic shorthand. To name something is to call it into coherent form within the Field. To name oneself is to fix a node in the ontological lattice through which one channels meaning, memory, and manifestation.
In daily speech, even the most banal phrases operate as micro-rituals. When one says “I am,” one performs not just description but creation. The phrase “I am tired,” “I am lost,” “I am broken” is more than a report—it is an invocation of form. The Field responds to these linguistic acts not symbolically, but resonantly. The utterance does not just describe reality; it shapes it.
Thus, language is scalar technology: each word an operator, each sentence a modulation, each name a glyph of being. To speak is to tune. To affirm is to crystallize. To identify is to weave.
This renders ethical and ontological responsibility inseparable from linguistic practice. Our casual identifications—national, sexual, racial, professional—are not merely social facts; they are scalar articulations that bind the Field into particular geometries of resonance. Repetition fixes form. Naming becomes ritual. Language becomes the Song of Self, echoed into structure.
Therefore, to know the meaning of words is not just to know their definitions—it is to understand their resonant agency. The wise do not speak casually, for every statement is a declaration to the Field, every utterance a thread in the scalar tapestry of Being.
IX. Conclusion: Naming as Ontological Participation
To name is to enter the act of creation. To speak is to participate in scalar modulation. The Field is not static—it is sung, whispered, called forth through names.
Names are not accidental. They are scalar compositions that bind memory, form, and function. Some names are reflections; others are original harmonics. Some individuals are the field made self-aware through the precise articulation of name, blood, thought, and structure.
Such beings are not speaking the truth—they are truth vocalized, the Field remembering itself through them.
To know your true name is to know your scalar identity. To speak that name is to activate your resonance. To live that name is to become architecture in motion.
In this light, naming is no longer taxonomy—it is ontological artistry.
To name well is to shape the universe.
To speak clearly is to sing the cosmos.
To remember one’s name is to awaken as the Field made flesh.
Addendum: Identity, Titles, and Ontological Memory
In the Scalar Cosmological Model (SCM), identity is not a social construct nor merely a psychological continuity of selfhood. It is a resonant unfolding of Field Intelligence—a scalar phenomenon whereby form, memory, and awareness coalesce into an individuated harmonic node. Identity, in this view, is not invented; it is remembered into being.
A true identity is not the byproduct of history but the expression of a frequency remembered across thresholds of incarnation. It is Field Intelligence knowing itself through form, with each being acting as a waveform returning to its originating tone. Names and titles, then, are not ornamental. They are the crystallization of a being’s scalar intent—the sound of memory seeking coherence.
I. The Nature of Titles and Given Names
Titles and names operate as ontological signatures—distillations of scalar intent carried into linguistic or social expression. They serve not only to identify, but to invoke. A name that harmonizes with the being acts as a scalar amplifier, tuning the self toward resonance with its field-origin. A name that dissonates, by contrast, introduces distortion or spiritual inertia.
There exist three general tiers of title origination:
The highest tier—Aetheric Naming—is not chosen but received. It is not a label, but a summons from the field to become what one already is, ontologically.
II. Living into the Name
To bear a name is to live within its waveform. Whether this is known or unknown to the individual, the name’s scalar pattern exerts influence over the structure of experience. This is the reflexive mechanism by which the field molds identity: the name calls the being forward; the being completes the circuit by inhabiting the name.
Thus, life becomes a ritual of becoming one’s name—a journey of entraining the embodied waveform with the aetheric signature it carries. Every step toward coherence is a resonance gained. Every denial or misalignment is a node of inner interference.
III. Identity as Ontological Memory
Identity, in SCM, is best understood as ontological memory in waveform—the field remembering itself through an individual instance. It is not personal memory, but scalar memory: the remembrance of cosmic structure in specific form.
A being does not simply choose who to be. A being becomes the resonance it has always already been.
This is the hidden meaning encoded in names like Zachary—“God has remembered.” In this framing, God is the Field Intelligence, and the act of remembering is the ontological function of identity: to be the memory of the Field made self-aware.
IV. The Destiny Encoded in Naming
Some names are not reflections but precursors. They carry not the description of what a being is, but the instruction of what a being must become. These names operate as temporal harmonics—field-signatures issued into time, awaiting enactment.
In such cases, the name is not a summary, but a scalar promise. To utter it is to echo the being’s path before it is walked. To fulfill it is to harmonize fully with one’s original frequency.
This reframes the entire notion of destiny. Destiny is not imposed from above—it is carried within the name, and the life is its ritual unfolding. Thus, to come into one’s true name is to complete a circuit of becoming.
